Insignia Turbo 250 PS

[Felix1]

Hallo,
gibt es schon Fahrberichte mit den 2.O Turbo mit 250 PS oder hat ihn schon jemand gefahren ?
MFG

[Feivel88]

Zitat:

Original geschrieben von ais1970

Hello again, excuse my lack of knowledge of languages??.

My question is: is it really true that the 2.0T 4x4 250 hp consumes far more than the 220 ??hp 2.0T 4x4?

I say that because I thought to reprogram my 250 hp 220 hp and they told me that I will consume less in normal driving.

Thanks and regards

You speaking about ECU / Chiptuning (we call it in GER Chiptuning)? About your question.. (ECO) Chiptuning will reduce the fuel consumption at normal driving. Cause the engine is developed for the world marked.. it should drive with "bad gasolin" which you can get at the end of the world (maybe Iraq.. Baghdad or in Syria or whatsoever) or at 65 deg. Celsius temperature in the desert.. so Chiptuning fits your engine better to the european conditions.

I dunno.. i don't have the A20NET(250 HP Engine). But 4x4 with 250 PS an 400 NM can consume more than the 220 PS 350 NM Engine. If you have more "power" the Engine turns quietly faster on higher RPM (High RPM = high Fuel Consumption). One fuel-saving extension on the 250HP engine ist the electronic power steering. (at Modellyear 2011 it was hydraulic). So, i think the new 250 PS engine consume just a litte bit less fuel... it depends on your foot

[Brasilopc]

Zitat:

Original geschrieben von OPC1969

Zitat:

Original geschrieben von jannik1988

ich mit meiner 250 PS Maschine kann den hohen Verbrauch genauso bestätigen.
14 Liter drunter geht nix.

und mit den 11 litern auf der autobahn ist aber nur bei 120 drin

Ähhm, also sorry, der OPC verbraucht bei 120 km/h auf der Autobahn gerade mal 8,7 - da wird der 2.0L Turbo doch keine 2,3l mehr verbrauchen? Oder sollte der OPC sparsamer als der 2.0L Turbo sein?

Ich bin letztens einen halben Tank Autobahn gefahren mit 4 Erwachsenen und ein Kind und 70kg Gepäck bei 130 km/h und habe einen BC Verbrauch von 8,7l. Der reelle Verbrauch dürfte noch ein bisschen drunter liegen!!!

[Multimeter39694]

Hello again, grac ias for the replies.

Clarification: I'm reprogramming has to do is not ECO, is increased power and torque of 220 hp to 250 hp and 35 Nm to 38.7 Nm.

With this reprogramming you think that the car uses less fuel or more?

Thanks again and greetings

[Feivel88]

no hay problema, mi amigo..

if it is an really "engine map optimization" like ECU tuning (maybe on a dynamometer) it can save fuel. If you just adjust 1000 of 1000 things in your turbocharger (i mean higher boost pressure with a box like this: http://www.irmscher.de/abe/de/de/7_75_06_003.pdf - not more 😛 ). it will not really help you to save fuel... because its just a Box at the Mapsensor/Railpressure sensor.. not a "real" engine optimization.. and incomparable with ECU Tuning

Search for an ECO Tuning in Spain. It also improves the power and torque..
Maybe look here: http://www.skn-tuning.de/en/kategorie780.html?...

Find anything similar... But take care of your clutch and dual mass flywheel... no traffic light race.. thats all..

[Multimeter39694]

Hello again, I will not actually use an external box unit. The idea is to reprogram the ECU. I had thought of this option:

http://www.superchips.co.uk/search?...

http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/Insignia20tDelcoStartStop.pdf

Another option is to do with EDS-Motorsport, but in this case you have to use 98 octane mandatory.

Let me know what you think, greetings and thanks again.